Case 1

Rules
Rule 60.1, Protests: Right to Protest
Rule 60.5(b), Protests: Protest Decisions
Rule 60.5(c), Protests: Protest Decisions

Summary:
A boat that breaks a rule while racing but continues to race may protest over a later incident, even though after the race she is disqualified for her breach.

Facts:
Boats A, B and C are racing with others. After an incident between A and B, A hails 'Protest!' and displays her protest flag, but B does not take a penalty. Later, B protests a third boat, C, after a second incident. The pretest committee hears A's protest against B and disqualifies B.

Question:
Does the fact that B is disqualified as a result of A’s protest make B’s protest against C invalid?

Answer:
No. When a boat continues to race after an alleged breach of a rule, her rights and obligations under the rules do not change. Consequently, even though A’s protest against B is upheld, the protest committee must hear B’s protest against C and, if B's protest is valid and the protest committee is satisfied from the evidence that C broke a rule, C must also be penalized (see rules 60.1, 60.5(b) and 60.5(c)).

Answer:

No. When a boat continues to race after an alleged breach of a rule, her rights and obligations under the rules do not change. Consequently, even though A’s protest against B is upheld, the protest committee must hear B’s protest against C and, if B's protest is valid and the protest committee is satisfied from the evidence that C broke a rule, C must also be penalized (see rules 60.1, 60.5(b) and 60.5(c)).